The long-running dream of a $1 million Bitcoin just ran headfirst into a new skeptic β and he didnβt mince words.
Thor Torrens, a technology entrepreneur and former adviser tied to Trump-aligned political efforts, sparked a firestorm this week after flatly declaring that Bitcoinβs seven-figure future is a fantasy. His reason wasnβt market cycles, regulation, or competition from other assets β it was artificial intelligence.
βBitcoin is never going to $1,000,000 a coin,β Torrens wrote on X.
Pressed to explain, he doubled down with a blunt thesis:
βPublic ledger. Too traceable now with AI, everyone will realize soon.β
Within hours, crypto Twitter lit up.
π₯ A Comment That Touched a Nerve
The backlash was swift and unforgiving.
Critics accused Torrens of misunderstanding Bitcoinβs fundamentals, with some dismissing his take as technically illiterate. One user shot back that privacy in digital finance has never truly existed, arguing that mobile phones, computers, and centralized on-ramps already expose users far more than blockchain transparency ever did.
Another critic pointed out that Bitcoinβs ledger has always been public.
βItβs always been traceable,β the user wrote. βThe degree is whatβs changed. KYC rules matter β not AI.β
What was meant as a cool-headed critique quickly turned into a full-blown ideological clash over what Bitcoin is β and what gives it value.
π§ What Torrens Is Really Arguing
At the core of Torrensβ argument is transparency.
Bitcoin transactions are permanently recorded on a public blockchain, visible to anyone willing to look. While wallet addresses donβt carry names, advances in AI-driven blockchain analytics have dramatically improved the ability to connect addresses to real-world identities β especially when combined with exchange data, metadata, and behavioral patterns.
Torrens appears to believe that as AI tools become more powerful and accessible, the illusion of financial anonymity will evaporate. In his view, that erosion of privacy undermines Bitcoinβs appeal as a long-term store of value β and places a hard ceiling on its price.
In short: a fully traceable asset, he argues, canβt command trillion-dollar mystique.
β Why Bitcoiners Say That Logic Falls Apart
Bitcoin advocates arenβt buying it.
They argue that transparency has never stopped Bitcoin before β in fact, itβs coincided with its rise. Institutional investors, ETFs, regulated custodians, and publicly listed companies have embraced Bitcoin precisely because itβs auditable and verifiable.
Others point to regulation, not AI, as the real privacy limiter. Know-your-customer rules, centralized exchanges, and banking integrations β not machine learning β are what tie wallets to identities.
And crucially, critics say Torrens is conflating privacy with value.
Bitcoinβs supporters argue that its scarcity, decentralization, censorship resistance, and role as digital collateral matter far more than anonymity β especially in a world moving toward full financial surveillance anyway.
π The $1 Million Camp Isnβt Backing Down
Despite the noise, Bitcoinβs loudest bulls remain unmoved.
Tom Lee of BitMine has repeatedly argued Bitcoin could exceed $1 million in the long run.
Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy, has long said a seven-figure Bitcoin is not only possible β but inevitable.
Samson Mow, CEO of Pixelmatic, has gone even further, projecting Bitcoin could reach $1 million by 2031.
βSince getting into Bitcoin,β Mow wrote earlier this year, βeverything always happens faster than I expect.β
To believers, AI isnβt a threat β itβs just another layer of infrastructure around an asset with mathematically fixed supply.
π The Reality Check: Bitcoin Is Still in Correction
While the philosophical battle rages, the charts are telling a quieter, colder story.
Bitcoin recently plunged to $76,000 before staging a modest rebound, but analysts say the damage isnβt done yet.
According to CCN analyst Victor Olanweraju, Bitcoin has suffered a series of key technical breakdowns:
BTC lost the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement near $93,300
It then failed to reclaim the 0.236 level around $85,500, which has now turned into firm resistance
βIn short, Bitcoin remains in a corrective phase,β Olanweraju said.
He added that unless Bitcoin decisively reclaims the $85,477 level, downside pressure could persist. A clean flip of that resistance, however, could reopen the path toward $93,290.
π§© The Bigger Debate
Torrensβ comments struck a nerve not because they were universally convincing β but because they challenged a sacred assumption: that Bitcoinβs future is purely about scarcity and adoption.
Instead, he injected a new variable into the debate β AI-powered transparency β forcing investors to confront how much privacy really matters in a digitized financial system.
Whether Bitcoin hits $1 million or not, one thing is clear:
The fight over why it should β or shouldnβt β is entering a whole new phase.
